hq/basspistol.com
hq/basspistol.com
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Updated '_posts/2020-10-22-streaming-to-the-masses.md' via CloudCannon

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Set Hallstrom 2020-10-22 13:44:13 +00:00 committed by CloudCannon
parent 99d38b27bd
commit a0e237bed5
1 changed files with 4 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
_posts/2020-10-22-streaming-to-the-masses.md
View file

@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ It's a fairly simple and common story. It wasn't a dream but an illusion\! We th
![](/images/posts/photo-2020-10-22-13-59-23.jpg){: width="749" height="403"}
The music market is shady. But it's not the shadiness of the music market that sets it apart from others. It's how it's value is being created. In that sense, making music is a bit like any art: it can be compared to printing money. You do something with a couple of tools and little funky shit. And boom\! Because of X and Y factor it is determined by some marketing cheif that it may or may not generate profit. Sure, there are many acts that are being blown up by the marketing department of a major record label who never see any real success in the habitual megastar sense. But it's out there and known, not first because of any particular musical value, but because millions of people where made aware of it. Music doesn't have to bring any actual value to society: it will not transport goods, build housing, make food... Sure, it might motivate someone to do all those things, but that's about where it stands. This means the value is organic and arbitrary at the same time. Like living-dead [Schrödinger cat](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat){: target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"}. Yet entire buildings of people depend on it to pay their rent.
The music market is shady. But it's not the shadiness of the music market that sets it apart from others. It's how it's value is being created. In that sense, making music is a bit like any art: it can be compared to printing money. You do something with a couple of tools and little funky shit. And boom\! Well... if it was that simple right? It has to be determined by some marketing chief that the music may generate profit first. Sure, there are many acts that are being blown up by the marketing department of a major record label, who never see any real success in the usual megastar sense. But it's out there and known. Not first because of any particular musical value, but because millions of people were made aware of it. Music doesn't have to bring any actual value to society to become valuable: it will not transport goods, build housing, make food... Sure, it might motivate someone to do all those things, but that's about where it stands. This means the value of music is organic and arbitrary at the same time. Like a living-dead [Schrödinger cat](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat){: target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"}. Or a ticket to an upcoming lottery. Yet entire buildings of people depend on it to pay their rent...
And the shadiness remained, worse it got amplified by the internet. Now music wasn't only a mean of motivating workers to produce, it also became a tool of surveillance. The industry abandonned sales and opted for rentification
And the shadiness remained, worse it got amplified on the Internet. Now music isn't only a mean of motivating workers to produce, it also became a tool of surveillance. The industry abandoned sales and opted for rectification. Why sell an album for 9$ when you can rent it out for 9$ per month? Centralizing the source also means now we can monitor exactly what plays, when, by whom and if we correlate that with a social media profile, we also know of what age, gender and religion.
## But did the dream really die though?